Anonymous submissions
Anonymous
Submissions
When bad policy, wasted spend, or a dead-end process becomes normal, readiness pays the bill. Use the anonymous lane to surface the regulation, broken workflow, or pointless spend before it hardens into the way things are done.
Flag a Regulation
Policies and directives that burn time, readiness, or mission effectiveness.
Submit an Idea
You know what would work better. Submit the process, technology, or structural fix.
Report Waste
Money, manpower, or materiel being consumed without mission return.
Anonymous by design. Reviewed on merit. Rewarded when action follows.
From submission to action.
Every submission moves through a clear pipeline. You can track its status from your private dashboard at any time.
Submitted
Your submission is received and screened for actionable content.
In Review
A reviewer claims your submission and researches the problem, the policy, or the opportunity.
Actioned
Your submission has been validated. The fix is being implemented or the recommendation is being escalated.
Completed
Done. It made the force better. Your up to $10,000 reward is processed through DFAS.
Up to $10,000 for every submission that makes us better.
This is not symbolic. Every submission that completes the full pipeline earns up to $10,000 paid directly by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.
How payment works
Once your submission is approved through the two-key process, your name and email are released only to DFAS so they can process the payment through existing military disbursement systems.
What qualifies
Waste you identified that gets eliminated, ideas that get implemented, and policies that get changed or rescinded all qualify. Every one that leads to action earns the reward.
Ideas win on merit, not on rank.
We separate identity from substance by design. The people reviewing your submission see the problem and the solution, not your name, rank, or unit. A good idea from an E-3 gets the same weight as one from an O-6, and no one in your chain of command will know you submitted it.
Blind by architecture
Your identity and your submission live in different systems. They cannot be connected during review.
Rank-blind evaluation
Reviewers see a codename, a category, and the substance. Nothing else. Merit decides.
Identity sealed until reward
Your identity is only accessible after a submission is actioned, and only to process payment. Your chain of command is never notified.